I’m Morten Magelssen, a medical doctor and currently a researcher at The Centre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo. Welcome to my web page.
As a researcher I take a particular interest in:
- Clinical ethics and clinical ethics committees
- Bioethical issues in light of Christian faith
- Conscientious objection in health care
- End-of-life decisions
PhD thesis: “Life, Medicine and Human Fulfilment. End-of-Life Decisions in Light of a Revised Natural Law Theory” (2014). From the report of the evaluation committee:
“Magelssen’s study is original, well-argued, and well-written. … the committee considers the dissertation as an excellent study of new natural law theory that adds important dimensions to the ethics of end-of-life decisions.”
Peer-reviewed academic papers in English:
Magelssen M. “Professional and conscience-based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist’s harmful prescription”. Journal of Medical Ethics 2017, published online first 24 Apr.
Blikshavn T, Husum TL, Magelssen M. “Four Reasons Why Assisted Dying Should Not Be Offered for Depression”. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2017; 14(1): 151-157.
Magelssen M, Gjerberg E, Pedersen R, Førde R, Lillemoen L. “The Norwegian national project for ethics support in community health and care services”. BMC Medical Ethics 2016; 17: 70.
Magelssen M, Gjerberg E, Lillemoen L, Førde R, Pedersen R. “Ethics support in community care makes a difference for practice”. Nursing Ethics 2016, published online first 22 Sep.
Magelssen M, Pedersen R, Førde R. “Four Roles of Ethical Theory in Clinical Ethics Consultation”. American Journal of Bioethics 2016; 16(9): 26–33.
Magelssen M, Kaushal S, Nyembwe KA. “Intending, hastening and causing death in non-treatment decisions: a physician interview study”. Journal of Medical Ethics 2016; 42(9): 592-596.
Magelssen M, Supphellen M, Nortvedt P, Materstvedt LJ. “Attitudes towards assisted dying are influenced by question wording and order: a survey experiment”. BMC Medical Ethics 2016; 17: 24.
Magelssen M, Nortvedt P, Solbakk JH. “Rationing at the bedside: Immoral or unavoidable?” Clinical Ethics 2016; 11(4): 112-121 [draft version (PDF)].
Magelssen M. “Prenatal Diagnosis and the Christian Health Professional”. Christian Bioethics, published online 2 Sep 2016.
Magelssen M, Filtvedt OJ. “Assisted Reproduction, the Logic of Liberalization, and Five Christian Responses”. Ethics & Medicine 2015; 31(3): 159-175.
Magelssen M, Pedersen R, Førde R. “Novel Paths to Relevance: How Clinical Ethics Committees Promote Ethical Reflection”. HEC Forum 2015; 28(3): 205-216 [draft version (PDF)].
Nordberg EMK, Skirbekk H, Magelssen M. “Conscientious objection to referrals for abortion: pragmatic solution or threat to women’s rights?” BMC Medical Ethics 2014; 15: 15.
Magelssen M, Pedersen R, Førde R. “Sources of bias in clinical ethics case deliberation”. Journal of Medical Ethics 2014; 40: 678-682.
Nordstrand SJ, Nordstrand MA, Nortvedt P, Magelssen M. “Medical students’ attitudes towards conscientious objection: a survey”. Journal of Medical Ethics Published online first 14.08.2013.
Magelssen M, Åsten P, Godal E, Os E, Smith A, Rusten Solås H, Hem MH. “Blood sampling from dying patients – an ethical dilemma”. Clinical Ethics 2012; 7: 107-110.
Magelssen M. “When should conscientious objection be accepted?” Journal of Medical Ethics 2012; 38: 18-21.
Magelssen M. “How details matter morally in the debate on conscientious objection. The case of Norway”. In: Frewer, Bergemann & Jäger, Jahrbuch Ethik in der Klinik 9, Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2016, pp. 343-350.
Magelssen M, Fredheim OMS. “A spiritual dimension is important for many patients”. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening 2011; 131: 138-140.
In addition I have published several Norwegian-language papers and a book on Christian bioethics.